![]() When looking only at applicants of one race, for example, those from the highest-income families still had an advantage. They found that racial differences were not driving the results. The new paper did not include admissions rates by race because previous research had done so, the researchers said. “While race-neutral on their face, too, these preferences undoubtedly benefit white and wealthy applicants the most,” he wrote. In a concurring opinion in the affirmative action case, Justice Neil Gorsuch addressed the practice of favoring the children of alumni and donors, which is also the subject of a new case. What questions do you have about paying for college? Tell us here. “I am proud of what we have done to increase socioeconomic diversity at Princeton, but I also believe that we need to do more - and we will do more.” We want to hear from you. “We believe that talent exists in every sector of the American income distribution,” said Christopher L. These include making tuition free for families earning under a certain amount giving only grants, not loans, in financial aid and actively recruiting students from disadvantaged high schools. Representatives from several of the colleges said that income diversity was an urgent priority, and that they had taken significant steps since 2015, when the data in the study ends, to admit lower-income and first-generation students. “Flipping that question on its head, could we potentially diversify who’s in a position of leadership in our society by changing who is admitted?” “Are these highly selective private colleges in America taking kids from very high-income, influential families and basically channeling them to remain at the top in the next generation?” said Raj Chetty, an economist at Harvard who directs Opportunity Insights, and an author of the paper with John N. ![]() It comes as colleges are being forced to rethink their admissions processes after the Supreme Court ruling that race-based affirmative action is unconstitutional. In effect, the study shows, these policies amounted to affirmative action for the children of the 1 percent, whose parents earn more than $611,000 a year. “What I conclude from this study is the Ivy League doesn’t have low-income students because it doesn’t want low-income students,” said Susan Dynarski, an economist at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, who has reviewed the data and was not involved in the study. The result is the clearest picture yet of how America’s elite colleges perpetuate the intergenerational transfer of wealth and opportunity. The new data shows that among students with the same test scores, the colleges gave preference to the children of alumni and to recruited athletes, and gave children from private schools higher nonacademic ratings. (The researchers did not name the colleges that shared data or specify how many did because they promised them anonymity.) It adds an extraordinary new data set: the detailed, anonymized internal admissions assessments of at least three of the 12 colleges, covering half a million applicants. ![]() It focuses on the eight Ivy League universities, as well as Stanford, Duke, M.I.T. The analysis is based on federal records of college attendance and parental income taxes for nearly all college students from 1999 to 2015, and standardized test scores from 2001 to 2015. The study - by Opportunity Insights, a group of economists based at Harvard who study inequality - quantifies for the first time the extent to which being very rich is its own qualification in selective college admissions. Data is from at least three of the dozen top colleges where the researchers had access to detailed admissions records. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |